RCTgo Forums

Full Version: Possible Build It! changes
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Hi all,

There's recently been some comments that we should stop showing the creator of entries in the Build It! Competition. This was, in fact, how the competition was originally set up, but was changed with the special rules for Round 100.

As I am always looking for feedback on how to improve RCTgo and the Build It! Competition, I'm going to let you - the community - decide what we should do. I've included a poll with this thread to gather your feedback.

If you have any other suggestions for how the Build It! Competition could be improved, please feel free to mention them in this thread.

Thanks!

Justin
Doesn't everybody like surprises? I think you should hide the creators names
removing the creators name could help make the voting more fair i guess, cause if someone like silv were to enter people would immediately vote for him cause its silvarret - if that makes sense
(Sep 26, 2015, 10:59 AM)Drew_ Wrote: [ -> ]removing the creators name could help make the voting more fair i guess, cause if someone like silv were to enter people would immediately vote for him cause its silvarret - if that makes sense

^agreed
With most designs it's easy to tell who built. I'm indifferent. But I guess, hide them.
hey i was the one who brought this up!!!
wow justin reads these things
Anyways, I think it would be fair, as people have been voting based on people who make it, not the quality of the coaster, so I think it would be fair
Nave
I'm on board with hiding the names! I think that's a change for the better!!! Smile
Thank you Justin! Blind pick eliminates bias for or against certain creators so it is definitely a good thing!
I would like to see full vote results not just the winner after each round. That would give the builders a hard number once the voting is done for each round.
(Sep 27, 2015, 10:02 AM)HLH3 Wrote: [ -> ]I would like to see full vote results not just the winner after each round. That would give the builders a hard number once the voting is done for each round.

That's a pretty good idea, surprised no one thought of this before
Pages: 1 2