tbh i think people are voting for hurricane just because its rct2 and not really looking at the other entries...

And you sound like a little boy, that has never played the old games!

Wasn't you that says in the past: "people take this competiton way to serious"
And now you bring such a comment about the votes! So who takes this competiton to serious now?

Why you care about what people vote for?!

And all members that votes for "Hurricane: 5" are right. They take a look to the other entries as well.
But why vote a crap deisgn, when they can vote for a good and solid RCT2 one.

BeastieBoydrumma is a really good designer, thats a fact, but "Pheonix" is a old design from 2013, not reworked in any term. And the video or teaser is from 2013, too.
Only digging out old stuff isn't a good choice for a competiton if it isn't reworked somehow.

TerryInferno is a great RCT2 creator, but new into NL. The track itself and video are good, but a mine-coaster without any theming doesn't look good. If Terry would build it with RCT2, than this could be grand. But with the lack of scenary/cso's for NL it isn't more than a normal work.

If "F14" was build from onyl oen person, i would say its nice. Because a launch-section on a dive-coaster is something new, and could work in real.
But for a "two-man" project it's way to generic. There should be more than this.
Both of you are talented, improve your own skills first, before starting a coop's.

Rudy18's Hurricane:5 isn't perfect, but overall it's better than the others.
He creates a whole theming, as aecrouch wrote, the landscaping was a lot of work, also the painting.
Maybe it doesn't look that smooth like in RCT3, but that's normal, so its okay.
Coaster itself looks good, not realistic, but the layout itself has enough "flow".
Only the blocky looking station are one negative thing for me. But everything else looks good and fits together, the colors too.

All entries have good/bad things, and Rudy18's has the fewest bad things. So i can understand why alot of members vote for Hurricane:5.

Me too, Rudy18 you got my vote!
(but improve your station builds in the future)

Lg Cheleste (badgirl4life)

^ tl;dr but i saw you say "why do you care for what people vote for"... why do you care about my opinion??? lol

tbh i think people are voting for hurricane just because its rct2 and not really looking at the other entries...

And you sound like a little boy, that has never played the old games!

Wasn't you that says in the past: "people take this competiton way to serious"
And now you bring such a comment about the votes! So who takes this competiton to serious now?

Why you care about what people vote for?!

And all members that votes for "Hurricane: 5" are right. They take a look to the other entries as well.
But why vote a crap deisgn, when they can vote for a good and solid RCT2 one.

BeastieBoydrumma is a really good designer, thats a fact, but "Pheonix" is a old design from 2013, not reworked in any term. And the video or teaser is from 2013, too.
Only digging out old stuff isn't a good choice for a competiton if it isn't reworked somehow.

TerryInferno is a great RCT2 creator, but new into NL. The track itself and video are good, but a mine-coaster without any theming doesn't look good. If Terry would build it with RCT2, than this could be grand. But with the lack of scenary/cso's for NL it isn't more than a normal work.

If "F14" was build from onyl oen person, i would say its nice. Because a launch-section on a dive-coaster is something new, and could work in real.
But for a "two-man" project it's way to generic. There should be more than this.
Both of you are talented, improve your own skills first, before starting a coop's.

Rudy18's Hurricane:5 isn't perfect, but overall it's better than the others.
He creates a whole theming, as aecrouch wrote, the landscaping was a lot of work, also the painting.
Maybe it doesn't look that smooth like in RCT3, but that's normal, so its okay.
Coaster itself looks good, not realistic, but the layout itself has enough "flow".
Only the blocky looking station are one negative thing for me. But everything else looks good and fits together, the colors too.

All entries have good/bad things, and Rudy18's has the fewest bad things. So i can understand why alot of members vote for Hurricane:5.

Me too, Rudy18 you got my vote!
(but improve your station builds in the future)

Lg Cheleste (badgirl4life)

Good to here from you Cheleste

The track itself and video are good, but a mine-coaster without any theming doesn't look good.

There could have been more buildings, but the station alone took a few hours to perfect, and the beams used to build the covered brake run did not want to cooperate with the supports at first, so I figured a roof over the lift hill would have been too fancy.

But I am glad I didn't enter one of my RCT2 tracks this round. Most of them would not have stood up well against the Hurricane.