RCTgo Forums
RCT3 Lumberjack - Printable Version

+- RCTgo Forums (https://forums.rctgo.com)
+-- Forum: Everything Else (https://forums.rctgo.com/forum-19.html)
+--- Forum: All That (https://forums.rctgo.com/forum-20.html)
+--- Thread: RCT3 Lumberjack (/thread-7411.html)

Pages: 1 2


RE: RCT3 Lumberjack - Ardy - Mar 31, 2013

Thanks. This coaster was one of my older ones, so it's not a newer coaster.


RE: RCT3 Lumberjack - FlightToAtlantis - Mar 31, 2013

My favorite woodie is the very first one I made properly. I put it in every park I build and it's always a steady draw for guests.


RE: RCT3 Lumberjack - abletudu - May 13, 2013

(Mar 30, 2013, 11:02 AM)alexwohlbruck Wrote: I saw it on my tablet, and I rated it a 5 because there were way too many long, straight sections on the ground, there were three lift hills, and it has minimal scenery. Also, you had in-game supports, at least use Dasmatze's re-texture. I liked the beginning, but after the second lift hill, things kind of went "down hill".

I too rated it a 5 for pretty much the same reasons, especially the facts of too many lift hills and the ingame supports as these left whole sections of track just floating in the air with no support whatsoever and no coaster would work that way; it is an accident just waiting to happen.


RE: RCT3 Lumberjack - CalderCity - May 13, 2013

I had to give it a 6. The layout is a 7 for me, but the lack of custom supports drop it a peg. If this were on a scale of 1 to 10 where custom supports are disregarded, I'd give an 8 for the efficient use of scenery items and landscaping. However, since I have seen things like ricket's work and other strong custom supported woodies, I have to grade on the scale that considers custom supports. Unfortunately, unsupported wooden coasters top out at a 7 for me. Nice job, though.


RE: RCT3 Lumberjack - Ardy - May 14, 2013

I admit, I wish I hadn't made such long straights, but oh well Frown


RE: RCT3 Lumberjack - FlightToAtlantis - May 14, 2013

I don't mean anyone in particular as I've seen this kind of comment in different threads across this forum. I'm not sure I understand why someone would indicate they didn't like a ride because it didn't come with a story or didn't come with satisfactory scenery. After all it is the ride that is being judged. If one is dissatisfied with something other than the ride then they should download the ride, put it in their own park, and get to work.