My head certainly felt like it had gone bucks!
No wonder you’re confused! I’m confused because I just tried to calculate ten wins in sequence before they happened and the wins aren’t working the way I thought they would.
Following my own rules I actually had every post winning twice. Sorry.
___________________________________________________________________________
Let’s try and get a winner with rules simpler than all that rubbish I wrote in my post #6 above. Why don’t I strike-through all that drek and let’s streamline the rules for this thread
:
Even Numbered Posts – Half Point Wins
Each even numbered post when halved will make the half value post # the winner, for example, if I make a post and it’s thread post #10 my post #10 will make post #5 the winning post, if I make a post and it’s thread post #28 my post #28 will make post #14 the winning post, if I make a post and it’s thread post #236 my post #236 will make post #118 the winning post. Now whenever an even numbered post is added to the board, if you are the person who originally made the winning halfway post you will get two points, and if you are not the person who originally made the halfway winning post, the halfway post winner would get three points.
Odd Numbered Posts – Self Wins
Because there aren’t enough halfway winners available for every post, to avoid the problem of no one posting an odd numbered post we’ll have all the odd numbered posts be self winning posts, for example, if I make a post and it’s thread post #11 my post #11 will win because it’s an odd numbered post, if I make a post and it’s thread post #29 my post #29 will win because it’s an odd numbered post, if I make a post and it’s thread post #237 my post #237 will win because it’s an odd numbered post. Now whenever an odd numbered post is added to the board, the person who made the odd numbered post will get one point.
A self win is one point, a halfway win if it’s yourself is two points, and a halfway win if somebody else gave you the halfway win is three points.
Examples:
Member A makes an odd numbered post (#105) and gets one point.
Member B makes an even numbered post (#180) and has previously posted halfway thread post #60. Member B gets two points.
Member C makes an even numbered post (#204) but member D has previously posted thread post #102 so Member D gets 3 points and Member C gets no points this round.
Although any post can say anything the member wants, if I were to make a post it might include something like this: “11 points. This post is self win. 12 points now.â€
I think this is better than the rules I’ve put a line through, no formulae, just everyone keeping track of their score.
___________________________________________________________________________
13th May
I’ve given this some more thought and thought it would be helpful if I actually calculated the scores. If we were to calculate the wins based on the posts in this thread so far this is what we’d have.
Post #1 (Round 1): The first self-post to qualify a single point win for the poster. I made this post but I will decline the point because the game hasn’t gone far enough that I should get points out of it.
Post #2 (Round 2): The first post to qualify a half-way win. 2 / 2 = 1 so with my post #1 I won this round with three points due to this post #2. I have declined the points because the game hasn’t gone far enough that I should get points out of it.
Post #3 (Round 3): a self-post because the number 3 can’t be evenly divided by 2. RCTgoMatthew won one point with this post.
Post #4 (Round 4): a half-way win because 4 can be divided evenly by 2. I made post #4 in round 4 but I get no points for this post because it’s a half-way win. 4 / 2 = 2 so Myansirchuckney would have won this round with 3 points for his post #2 in round 2. And again it doesn’t matter what the posts say, just what number they are when they appear in the thread.
Post #5 (Round 5): a self-winning post because the number 5 won’t divide evenly by 2. AndrewKramer would have won this round with 1 point for his post #5.
Post #6 (Round 6): although mostly rubbish we’ll count it in here in order to help understand the tabulation process. Post #6 represents a half-way win. I wouldn’t have gotten any points because this post can divide by 2. 6 / 2 = 3 so RCTgoMatthew won this round with 3 points with his post #3 in round 3. If it happened that I had already made post #3 I would have only gotten 2 points due to post #6 for my post #2 in round 2. Remember if your half-way post makes another member win that round that winner gets 3 points. If your half-way post makes you yourself-win that round you’ll only get two points but RCTgoMatthew wins this round with 3 points.
Post #7 (Round 7): Yes, RCT3Demos, you did win. That post was a self-post and got you one point.
Post #8 (Round 8): Sixflagsgr8 made post #8 which is a half-way post so he gets no points because this post # can be divided by 2. 8 / 2 = 4 and I posted #4 so due to my post in round 4 I would have won three points due to post #8 being on the board. Again I decline the points because the game hasn’t gone far enough that I should get points out of it.
Post #9 (Round 9): a self-post. I would have gotten one point for that post. Again, we’re not including my points in the score at this time.
Post #10 (Round 10): When this post is made it will represent a halfway win. 10 / 2 = 5. As you see, Andrew Kramer posted post #5 in round 5. If he posts post #10 in round 10 he’ll win 2 points. If another member posts post #10 then Andrew Kramer will win 3 points. Remember if your half-way post makes another member win that round that winner gets 3 points. If your half-way post makes you yourself-win that round you’ll only get two points.
So, totally ignoring my points at this juncture we have the scores for this thread up until post 9 (in alphabetical order):
AndrewKramer: 1 point
Myansirchuckney: 3 points
RCTDemos: 1 point
RCTgoMatthew: 4 points
FlightToAtlantis: points declined
___________________________________________________________________________
What a relief! A points/scoring system that actually works now. A-a-and I see I’ve got to strike through the information in my post #1 as well.